Skip to main content

Trio Kenwood KD-1033 turntable main bearing service

  One of my first posts in this blog was regarding the servicing of the Pioneer PL12D turntable, and that has proven to be the most popular by a significant margin. The Pioneer PL12D had its competitors, and probably the most popular alternative was the Trio Kenwood KD-1033 turntable. I use both names (Trio and Kenwood) as the company operated under different names in different markets. In the UK they were Trio, possibly because the brand Kenwood was most famous here for food blenders. 95% of a KD-1033 is similar to  Pioneer PL12D, and servicing them is very much the same process. Both are belt drive , have an AC synchronous motor,  mechanical speed change , a main bearing, sprung top deck and rubber motor mounts. the KD-1033 uses a different type of anti skate mechanism, employing a thread and weight. The plinth is shallower with an internal cross brace. One aspect that is different is the design of the main bearing, and servicing it is a little harder than a PL12D. The Pioneer main b

the curse of the GU10 halogen bulb

I know more than I want to about these light bulbs. While the UK Government is waging war on the 100 watt incandescent light bulb, they have, typically, ignored the growing trend of using these bulbs. I guess they pay people to change bulbs for them.

We had our house gutted and rebuilt in 2000, and as a consequence had around 40 recessed lights fitted, each of which take the GU10 mains voltage (240v) GU10 light bulbs.

At first, the main issue was that the halogen bulbs had a very short life span and cost a lot to buy, around £5. I seemed to be changing a couple a week. Things have improved and now the bulbs are relatively cheap ( £1-£2) and have a fairly long life expectancy.

So what is my gripe ? Well these bulbs are rated at a hefty 35 or 50 watts. The packaging even implies that they are energy saving in some way, but of course watts are watts. i
If you have 5 * 50 watts halogen bulbs in your kitchen, then you are using a unit every 4 hours they are on. If I turn on all the halogens (assuming the bulbs are 50 watts) then I'm using 2Kw. that's the same as my washing machine

So my point is that 2 * 50 watts GU10 bulbs = 1 * 100 watts bulb .

The other thing to note about these bulbs is they get very hot. The recessed light fittings are supposed to have a heat cowl fitted above them if in open loft space to prevent insulation or other material touching the back of the bulbs which get quite hot.


While the light from these bulbs is good quality I was unhappy with the energy consumption and nervous that a couple of installations might create a fire risk above. I looked into low energy versions and here is what I found:



















The bulbs above are all GU10-fittings, but use a range of technologies. You can also see that while they share the same diameter and lugs at the top, they vary in length.

These are from the left :
  • 11watt Compact Florescent (CFL) Megaman brand cost £8
  • 7 watt Compact Florescent (CFL) Farnell brand £8
  • 1.5 watt LED unknown brand £9
  • 50 watt halogen Sylvania brand £2

So the three technologies for GU10 bulbs are LED, CFL and Halogen.

  • The Megaman I got from B&Q and it's the best of the CFLs and probably the best alternative. gives reasonable light instantly. In common with all CFLs the light quality is a bit bleached or cold, but they work well. The only issue is that they are physically much longer, and depending on the light fitting , they may not fit. Most of my recessed fittings are backless. the bulb is gripped by the rim and the electricity is connected by a loose cable connector at the back. This means the depth of the bulb can be accommodated. You may find that your fittings will not accept a bulb this deep, so it's important to check before buying.
  • The Farnell bulb is closer to the form-factor of a standard GU10 bulb and can be used where the depth problem described above is an issue. Even so the dimensions are not *exactly* the same around the 'neck'. These do not give good light from switch on, and need a few minutes to warm up, initially giving a pinkish light. However once warm they work well, and I have a set of these in my utility room.
  • I had high hopes for LED technology as this appears to provide the cheapest running costs. However the light quality is very poor. A dim cold bluish light which is not good for spotlights. I also noted that some of the individual LEDS' have failed over a 2 year period, so reliability is not great. I have high hopes for LED lighting, and I have seen some bulbs on the web which use a single high power LED rather than an array of 20 smaller ones. However these are currently around £23 per bulb, too much to be practical
  • Finally you see a halogen bulb for reference. excellent light quality, but heavy power consumption and they get very hot.
So in conclusion the Megaman variety wins as the best allround replacement if you want to use less energy and generate less CO2. the Farnell offers a viable alternative where space is an issue. LED bulbs have yet to be a viable alternative. I noticed that all the display units in B&Q use LED bulbs. This is , I assume, to reduce their energy costs, but it also provides a way to see the type of light they provide.


update 9/01/10


yesterday I visited the local B&Q, and noticed they had a number of LED bulbs. They had the standard ones as I'd used and dismissed above, but they also had a much more expensive 'alpha' range. Two types, one was a 20watt equivalent for around £16 ! This appeared to have a single large LED at the centre, and the light was described as brilliant white.

the second was a 10 watt equivalent which uses 24 SMD white (Surface Mount Device). the dome is difuse so it's hard to see what the LED's look like but I can make out that they are yellow. I have seen pictures on the web of a new type of LED bulb which uses rectangular yello LED's , not the tiny spherical ones , found in the cheaper LED bulbs.This was around £12 and the light was described as soft white.

Because I now appear to have an obsession with finding an energy efficient GU10 bulb, I got the one of the second type to try. £12 is a high price for a bulb, but in the persuit of science ....


Anyway I used it to replace a standard GU10 that had failed in my bathroom, and the light quality is excellent. Better than either brand of CFL and a million miles from the previous LED bulb. Light quality is warmer , like a regular GU10 halogen. Perhaps it's a little diffuse as it does not have a single light source, but very good. It only consumes 2.8 watts around 1/20th of a 50watt GU10.

Update 10/07/2010


I recently aquired a number of another type of LED GU10 bulb. These have 3 high powered LED's and are suited as spotlights. They use only 2.8watts and cost around £12 each. These work very well where the earlier Alpha type are too diffuse.


Update 11/11/2016


My work here is done :) LED bulbs are now the obvious choice and halogens are being phased out across the EU.
 
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/01/halogen-spotlights-to-be-phased-out-across-europe

Comments

Anonymous said…
Thanks for detailing your experience. I'm currently looking for a good replacement for halogens.
Anonymous said…
Yes I have had the same problem. Halogens have great light quality but are worthkess in every other way. I have a decorative light fitting with adjustable bulb holders and the 50W bulbs get so hot so quickly that I have to use a glove to touch the holders. I am about to switch to CFL's, thanks!
Anonymous said…
Yes I have had the same problem. Halogens have great light quality but are worthkess in every other way. I have a decorative light fitting with adjustable bulb holders and the 50W bulbs get so hot so quickly that I have to use a glove to touch the holders. I am about to switch to CFL's, thanks!
Mr Ives said…
Take a look at LED's though. Some of the bulbs around the £10 mark are better than CFL's and not much more expensive. they are also only 3 watts. I have a more recent blog on the different LED'GU10's I've tried
Anonymous said…
Thanks, Have 4 separate units in my kitchen each with 3 rotating/positional GU10 stalks. (http://thumbs3.ebaystatic.com/m/mA1O8kud-977CPqUt14ggpg/140.jpg) Because at least one halogen bulb seem to go every month, was considering having them changed back to Fluorescent 4ft strips but will now try GU10 CFL's & LED's.
(Never had to change a blown Fluorescent tubes but wife hated them.)
Mr Ives said…
Have a look at my LED related blogs. I think CFL is a stopmgap technology, especially for GU10 form factor bulbs. SimplyLED have GU10 NEXTgen LED bulbs that are brighter than halogens and are instantly on. The trouble you will have with CFL GU10s is that they take several minutes to achieve full brightness. Based on the megaman range I tested they also seem to suffer from heat fractures over time. LED is expensive BUT your current fittings are consuming best part of 1kwh per hour they are on.
Anonymous said…
Bought new spotlight fittings using gu10 bulbs. What low energy brands would you suggest to replace these?
Mr Ives said…
Well I favour the nextgen ones that simplyLED.co.uk sell. A colleague said he had had good experience with the MEGAman LED GU10 in the warmer white colour tint. I think the important thing is to buy them from somewhere that you can replace them if you don't find the colour or brightness agreeable
Unknown said…
I have a similar problem as described with the length of bulbs. Our fittings will only accept a bulb of around 75mm in length, with the shorter ones not fitting. Manufacturers don't seem to recognise bulb length as a key attribute of a bulb - often not listing on it all. I really wish GU10s came in one standard size.

Originally our house was fitting with CFLs, but I've slowly been moving over to LEDs. Unfortunately it's still hard to get the perfect bulb. Either they don't fit, have poor light, too bright, don't dim, have poor angle of light or just cost way too much. Any way, I feel your pain - I feel like I spend way to much time thinking about light bulbs.
Anonymous said…
Thanks for coming back and updating this web page - far too many are out of date, and it's the curse of the internet in some ways. I'm aware of it, but I still get caught out reading 5 year old articles!!!
Mr Ives said…
My pleasure Anonymous, LED GU10 bulbs have done me well, most of the ones I bought back in 2010 are still going, and have contributed to year-on-year energy saving. new technology tends to use less energy. See the coda to my blog on refrigerators

Popular posts from this blog

Restoring a Pioneer PL-12D Turntable

 I got back into vinyl records about 18 months ago, and have collected a few hundred albums, mostly second hand. I have a number of turntables (NAD 5120, Ariston QDeck, Pioneer PL12D ) which I got also second hand. I keep a few, some end up passed onto friends, some that are too far gone are kept for spares. In most cases they have required a little work to get them running again. Last week I was lucky enough to get a Pioneer PL-12D turntable from freecycle. The lady who offered it, said that she in turn had received it from freecycle , and had replaced the belt but couldn't get on with the springiness of it, and had got a modern USB turntable. I have previously worked on one of these decks, and know what she means about the suspension system used. While this blog is specifically about this particular model of deck, many of the concepts are similar to others from this vintage. Many Japanese belt drive decks throughout the  1970's shared very similar construction, so this ma

Bracing IKEA EXPEDIT or KALLAX cabinets for greater rigidity when used with a turntable

The inevitable problem, too many records. Turntable and amplifier on top Like many record collectors around the world, I have a number of IKEA cube cabinets from both their EXPEDIT (older) and KALLAX (newer) ranges. These are easy to make, cheap to buy and perfect for record storage. The system comes flat packed and uses bolts and dowels to hold the system together. If you follow the instructions  the system is strong and should not collapse. You can augment the joints with PVA wood glue for extra strength. My turntable sits on top of an EXPEDIT 2x4 cabinet, laid along the long side, with some felt feet to support it from the floor, and you can use KALLAX in the same way. It's been great but has two problems I wanted to address : 1) Because the system has no back panel, the records  can be pushed too far back. 2) While the structure is strong and fairly rigid, there was some lateral movement. With heavy equipment on top, I found that if I nudged or knocked either top side, this all

a vintage Sonab 85S / Yamaha CP-500 turntable

The Sonab 85S turntable You'll see from this blog that I'm interested in vintage audio equipment , especially turntables and speakers. I keep an eye on ebay for potential bargains, and saw this turntable listed quite close to me and for a very good price, £60 buy it now, including 45 adapter, dust bug, DIN adapter, record clamp and a very nice Shure M95 cartridge. Condition listed as very good and with the original sonab headshell. I've been interested in this deck for sometime, as to my eyes , it's a particularly nice design, with the very simple tonearm and deep chassis. I was aware that the model , from the late 70's was a cooperation between Swedish manufacturer Sonab and Yamaha. I don't know how much was contributed by which firm, but the same deck, or one very similar is also to be found as the Yamaha CP-500, though typically in teak rather than black. There were two Sonab models , the 75 and 85, the former being a manual  deck, the latter an automatic, an