Skip to main content

Trio Kenwood KD-1033 turntable main bearing service

  One of my first posts in this blog was regarding the servicing of the Pioneer PL12D turntable, and that has proven to be the most popular by a significant margin. The Pioneer PL12D had its competitors, and probably the most popular alternative was the Trio Kenwood KD-1033 turntable. I use both names (Trio and Kenwood) as the company operated under different names in different markets. In the UK they were Trio, possibly because the brand Kenwood was most famous here for food blenders. 95% of a KD-1033 is similar to  Pioneer PL12D, and servicing them is very much the same process. Both are belt drive , have an AC synchronous motor,  mechanical speed change , a main bearing, sprung top deck and rubber motor mounts. the KD-1033 uses a different type of anti skate mechanism, employing a thread and weight. The plinth is shallower with an internal cross brace. One aspect that is different is the design of the main bearing, and servicing it is a little harder than a PL12D. The Pioneer main b

trying to save energy : trying to make sense of the results

So in my previous blog I outlined how it's easy to log your consumption, how to convert everything to the same units (KwH) and a site - imeasure - which makes this a lot easier.

If you do all of the above , or even some of it, you will see how much energy you use per week. Over time you may see trends, probably connected to the seasons. My household gas usage drops in the summer and rises in the winter - pretty predictable stuff.

I'm going to park oil, as I don't have any experience of using heating oil, but much of what I describe will be similar for gas & oil.

Separating the consumption of gas , in my case for central heating (CH) and hot water (HW), from electricty for a moment, it's worth thinking about what determines how much is used.

for gas, it's used by a boiler. the boiler heats water in a heat exchanger which is pumped through the house, and diverted either through a coil in a how water tank (HW) or through radiators in the house. This is referred in the UK as a fully pumped 3-switch central heating system, and I suspect it's pretty common.

Various controls - thermostats and timers - determine when the boiler comes on and for how long. the better insulated the house and tank are the lower the losses and the less gas that needs to be burn in the boiler. Also the better the controls - the more regulation of the amount of gas used.

In my case the HW circuit comes on twice a day determined by a timer/programmer unit. heat is diverted to the HW tank , determined by the tank stat, a small box strapped to the side of the tank , which touches the copper skin of the tank and switches off when the tank is hot enough. 55 degrees is supposedly the best temperature to set the tank to.

the Boiler has an additional thermostat in it, which always seems to be set at 2-thirds by each engineer who has ever serviced it. This sets how hot the boiler can get assuming it is required to deliver full heat to HW, CH or both.

In the case of CH, it's determined by a) the timer/controller i.e.e is this a period of heating and then b) by a room stat in the hall which determines how hot the house is supposed to get.

I'm not a fan of conventional bi-metallic room stats and favour programmable timer/stats which are much smarter and flexible (see my other blog on the CM67 ).

You can further refine the arrangement with more zonal heating. Commonly this is achieved in the UK with thermostatic radiator valves (TRV's for short) which enable a degree of local control on a room by room basis. the ideas is that if some rooms need to be cooler than the main house stat OR if they have some other form of heat (Sunshine coming in, computers/games consoles pumping out hot air) they regulate the radiators nearby to compensate. this in turn means the system requires less heat and this feeds back to the boiler needing to be on for less time.

Personally have never found TRV's to work that well. They rely on mechanical temperature expansion properties of a solid to open/close the valve, which given that they are attached to the principal heat source ,the radiator, is pretty crude and suffers from hysteresis (over swing).

reducing the amount of gas you use is most easily addressed by :

a) reducing losses . Better insulation for the house and the hot water tank. I fit a second jacket on the tank , even if it has a polyurethane foam one pre-bonded to it.

b) fitting good controls. A tank stat will ensure you only heat HW to the right temperature. A good thermostat will set the house to the right temperature. The timer stats also set the temperature based on previous days data , so start heating earlier to achieve a set temperature at a specific time - an optimise feature.

c) setting the controls. Figure out what temperature you need the house at different times. if no-one is in perhaps during the day, the temperature can be allowed to drop, but raise the temperature for the evening when people are at home. Similarly at night it can be cooler.
most systems implement this crudely with a timer which turns on CH at different times of the day, with no consideration of what temperature the house is or may need to be at a future point. My CH is actually left on at the timer all year, even in summer BUT the programmes in the room stat determine if it comes on i.e if the house is at the right temperature at the appropriate time.


d) ensuring the system is performing to spec i.e have the boiler routinely serviced, bleed the radiators.



So by considering and optimising factors a), b) & c) you should be able to see how much impact this has on gas consumption. This is harder to do than electricity. the boiler is essentially a binary device. It is on or off, it's just a matter of how long for. Electricity is more varied depending on the load. It may take months or even a years worth of data to see what impact measure have had, and external factors like weather , will also affect the results. I'd also mention that many electrical appliances generate heat either directly or as a bi-product of some other function, and cutting back on them may mean the CH has to work harder. This is why I favour converting everything to the same units , to try to see what impact this has across fuels i.e lowering electrical use might increase CH demand.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Restoring a Pioneer PL-12D Turntable

 I got back into vinyl records about 18 months ago, and have collected a few hundred albums, mostly second hand. I have a number of turntables (NAD 5120, Ariston QDeck, Pioneer PL12D ) which I got also second hand. I keep a few, some end up passed onto friends, some that are too far gone are kept for spares. In most cases they have required a little work to get them running again. Last week I was lucky enough to get a Pioneer PL-12D turntable from freecycle. The lady who offered it, said that she in turn had received it from freecycle , and had replaced the belt but couldn't get on with the springiness of it, and had got a modern USB turntable. I have previously worked on one of these decks, and know what she means about the suspension system used. While this blog is specifically about this particular model of deck, many of the concepts are similar to others from this vintage. Many Japanese belt drive decks throughout the  1970's shared very similar construction, so this ma

Bracing IKEA EXPEDIT or KALLAX cabinets for greater rigidity when used with a turntable

The inevitable problem, too many records. Turntable and amplifier on top Like many record collectors around the world, I have a number of IKEA cube cabinets from both their EXPEDIT (older) and KALLAX (newer) ranges. These are easy to make, cheap to buy and perfect for record storage. The system comes flat packed and uses bolts and dowels to hold the system together. If you follow the instructions  the system is strong and should not collapse. You can augment the joints with PVA wood glue for extra strength. My turntable sits on top of an EXPEDIT 2x4 cabinet, laid along the long side, with some felt feet to support it from the floor, and you can use KALLAX in the same way. It's been great but has two problems I wanted to address : 1) Because the system has no back panel, the records  can be pushed too far back. 2) While the structure is strong and fairly rigid, there was some lateral movement. With heavy equipment on top, I found that if I nudged or knocked either top side, this all

a vintage Sonab 85S / Yamaha CP-500 turntable

The Sonab 85S turntable You'll see from this blog that I'm interested in vintage audio equipment , especially turntables and speakers. I keep an eye on ebay for potential bargains, and saw this turntable listed quite close to me and for a very good price, £60 buy it now, including 45 adapter, dust bug, DIN adapter, record clamp and a very nice Shure M95 cartridge. Condition listed as very good and with the original sonab headshell. I've been interested in this deck for sometime, as to my eyes , it's a particularly nice design, with the very simple tonearm and deep chassis. I was aware that the model , from the late 70's was a cooperation between Swedish manufacturer Sonab and Yamaha. I don't know how much was contributed by which firm, but the same deck, or one very similar is also to be found as the Yamaha CP-500, though typically in teak rather than black. There were two Sonab models , the 75 and 85, the former being a manual  deck, the latter an automatic, an